EcoBioTech

In recent years, there has been a decline in the reproductive potential of Pinus sibirica, in connection with climate change and the mass harvesting of pine nuts. To reproduce this species, it is necessary to use modern reproduction methods, one of which is the technology of somatic embryogenesis in vitro culture. P. sibirica is a species that is not susceptible (“recalcitrance”) to somatic embryogenesis. Previously, it was not possible to obtain proliferating embryogenic cultures of this species. The aim of the work was to study the influence of the developmental stage of the zygotic embryo on the initiation of somatic embryogenesis in Pinus sibirica. When culturing explants on DCR medium with growth regulators of 2 mg/l 2,4D and 1 mg/l 6-BAP, we found that the initiation of somatic embryogenesis depends on the stage of development of the explant (zygotic embryo). The maximum level of initiation is derived from the post-cleavage stage of the implant.

Pinus sibirica ◆ zygotic embryo ◆ somatic embryogenesis ◆ cleavage ◆ embryonal-suspensor mass

Borodintseva L.I., Tarakanov V.V., Goncharova T.V. (2023) Productivity and quality of seeds of the siberian stone pine on forest seed orchards in the republic of Altai // Siberian Forest Journal. (4): 52–57. https://doi.org/10.15372/SJFS20230405 (in Rus.)

Vasilieva G.V., Zhuk E.A., Popov A.G. (2010) Flowering phenology of the Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour), Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila (Pall.) Regel.) and their hybrids // Tomsk State University Journal. Biology. (1(9)): 61–67. (in Rus.)

Goroshkevich S.N. (2000) Breeding of Siberian cedar as a nut-bearing breed // Forestry. (4): 25–27.

Kruglova N.N., Egorova O.V., Seldimirova O.A., Zaitsev D.Yu., Zinnatullina A.E. (2013) The light microscope as a tool in plant biotechnology. Gilem. Ufa: 128. (in Rus.)

Tretyakova I.N. (1990) Embryology of conifers: physiological aspects. Nauka Publ. Novosibirsk: 157. (in Rus.)

Tretyakova I.N., Voroshilova E.V. (2014) Embryo initiation from Pinus sibirica megagametophytes in vitro culture // Russian Journal of Developmental Biology. 45(2): 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360414020064

Tretyakova I.N., Voroshilova E.V., Shuvaev D.N., Lukina A.S. (2013) Formation of Callus and Induction of Somatic Embryos in vitro Culture in Pinus sibirica du Tour // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Biology. 6(1): 44–60. (in Rus.)

Tretyakova I.N., Novoselova N.V. (2003) Specific features of development of megagametophytes and embryos of the Siberian stone pine in vitro // Ontogenez. 34(4): 282–291. (in Rus.)

Shuklina A.S., Tretyakova I.N. (2019) Somatic embryogenesis of species of the genus Pinus in culture in vitro // The successes of modern biology. 139(2): 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1134/S004213241902008X (in Rus.)

Arya S., Kalia R.K., Arya I.D. (2000) Induction of somatic embryogenesis in Pinus roxburghii Sarg // Plant Cell Reports. 19: 775–780.

Becwar M.R., Wann S.R., Johnson M.A., Verhagen S.A., Feirer R.P., Nagmani R. (1988) Development and Characterization of in Vitro Embryogenic Systems in Conifers // In: Ahuja M.R. (ed.) Somatic Cell Genetics of Woody Plants: Proceedings of the IUFRO Working Party S2. 04–07 Somatic Cell Genetics, held in Grosshansdorf, Federal Republic of Germany, August 10–13, 1987. Springer Netherlands. Dordrecht: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2811-4_1

Bonga J.M., Klimaszewska K.K., von Aderkas P. (2010) Recalcitrance in clonal propagation, in particular of conifers // Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 100(3): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-009-9647-2

Buchholz J.T. (1926) Origin of cleavage polyembryony in conifers // Botanical Gazette. 81(1): 55–71.

Cairney J., Pullman G.S. (2007) The cellular and molecular biology of conifer embryogenesis // New Phytologist. 176(3): 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02239.x

Castander-Olarieta A., Moncaleán P., Montalbán I.A. (2022) Somatic Embryogenesis in Pines // In: Ramírez-Mosqueda M.A. (ed.) Somatic Embryogenesis: Methods and Protocols. Humana. New York, NY: 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2485-2_4

Dogra P.D. (1978) Morphology, development and nomenclature of conifer embryo // Phytomorphology. 28(7): 307–322.

Doyle J. (1961) Proembryogeny in Pinus in relation to that in other conifers: a survey // Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Section B: Biological, Geological, and Chemical Science. 62: 181–216.

Ershova M.A., Ignatenko R.V., Chirva O.V. (2025) The state of the explant as a key factor influencing the initiation of Pinus sylvestris L. somatic embryogenesis // Plant Biotechnology Reports. 19(1): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-024-00947-9

Fehér A., Bernula D., Gémes K. (2016) The Many Ways of Somatic Embryo Initiation // In: Loyola-Vargas V., Ochoa-Alejo N. (eds.) Somatic Embryogenesis: Fundamental Aspects and Applications. Springer International Publishing. Cham: 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33705-0_3

Fei Q., Chen Y.-M., Ke X., Ye J.-R., Zhu L.-H. (2024) Somatic embryogenesis of slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.): initiation, maturation, germination and mycorrhization of regenerated plantlets // Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 157(3): 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-024-02789-3

Filonova L.H., Bozhkov P. V., Brukhin V.B., Daniel G., Zhivotovsky B., Arnold S. von (2000) Two waves of programmed cell death occur during formation and development of somatic embryos in the gymnosperm, Norway spruce // Journal of Cell Science. 113(24): 4399–4411. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.113.24.4399

Gao F., Peng C., Wang H., Tretyakova I.N., Nosov A.M., Shen H., Yang L. (2020) Key Techniques for Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration of Pinus koraiensis // Forests. 11(9): 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090912

García-Mendiguren O., Montalbán I.A., Goicoa T., Ugarte M.D., Moncaleán P. (2016) Environmental conditions at the initial stages of Pinus radiata somatic embryogenesis affect the production of somatic embryos // Trees. 30(3): 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1336-7

Gupta P.K., Durzan D.J. (1987) Biotechnology of Somatic Polyembryogenesis and Plantlet Regeneration in Loblolly Pine // Nature Biotechnology. 5(2): 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0287-147

Hazubska-Przybył T., Wawrzyniak M.K., Kijowska-Oberc J., Staszak A.M., Ratajczak E. (2022) Somatic Embryogenesis of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine: Possibility of Application in Modern Forestry // Forests. 13(2): 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020155

Ignatenko R. V., Chirva O. V., Ershova M.A., Galibina N.A. (2022) Some Problems Arising during the Initiation of Somatic Embryogenesis in Pinus sylvestris L. // The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Forests - Exploring New Discoveries and New Directions in Forests. November 1, 2022. MDPI. Basel Switzerland: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13364

Kim Y.-W., Moon H.-K. (2014) Relationship between initiation of embryogenic suspensor mass (ESM) and zygotic embryo development in Pinus densiflora // Forest Science and Technology. 10(3): 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2014.889611

Klimaszewska K., Park Y.-S., Overton C., Maceacheron I., Bonga J.M. (2001) Optimized somatic embryogenesis in Pinus strobus L. // In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant. 37(3): 392–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-001-0069-z

Koski V. (1971) Embryonic lethals of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. // Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae. 75(3): 1–30.

Lara-Chavez A., Flinn B.S., Egertsdotter U. (2011) Initiation of somatic embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos of Oocarpa pine (Pinus oocarpa Schiede ex Schlectendal) // Tree Physiology. 31(12): 1422–1422. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr126

Lelu-Walter M.-A., Klimaszewska K., Miguel C., Aronen T., Hargreaves C., Teyssier C., Trontin J.-F. (2016) Somatic Embryogenesis for More Effective Breeding and Deployment of Improved Varieties in Pinus spp.: Bottlenecks and Recent Advances // In: Loyola-Vargas V., Ochoa-Alejo N. (eds.) Somatic Embryogenesis: Fundamental Aspects and Applications. Springer International Publishing. Cham: 319–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33705-0_19

Montalbán I.A., Castander-Olarieta A., Pereira C., Canhoto J., Moncaleán P. (2020) Use of Biotechnology in Forestry Breeding Programs for Natural Resources and Biodiversity Conservation: Creating Super Trees for the Future // In: Chong P., Newman D., Steinmacher D. (eds.) Agricultural, Forestry and Bioindustry Biotechnology and Biodiscovery. Springer International Publishing. Cham: 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51358-0_6

Montalbán I.A., De Diego N., Moncaleán P. (2012) Enhancing initiation and proliferation in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) somatic embryogenesis through seed family screening, zygotic embryo staging and media adjustments // Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 34(2): 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0841-6

Novikova S. V., Oreshkova N. V., Sharov V. V., Kuzmin D.A., Demidko D.A., Bisirova E.M., Zhirnova D.F., Belokopytova L. V., Babushkina E.A., Krutovsky K. V. (2024) Study of the Genetic Mechanisms of Siberian Stone Pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) Adaptation to the Climatic and Pest Outbreak Stresses Using Dendrogenomic Approach // International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 25(21): 11767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252111767

Owens J.N., Simpson S.J., Molder M. (1982) Sexual reproduction of Pinus contorta. II. Postdormancy ovule, embryo, and seed development // Canadian Journal of Botany. 60(10): 2071–2083. https://doi.org/10.1139/b82-254

Park Y.-S., Beaulieu J., Bousquet J. (2016) Multi-varietal forestry integrating genomic selection and somatic embryogenesis // In: Park Y.S., Bonga J.M., Moon H.K. (eds.) Vegetative propagation of forest trees. National Institute of Forest Science (NiFos) Seoul.: 302–322.

Pullman G.S. (2018) Embryogenic Tissue Initiation in Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) // In: Jain S., Gupta P. (ред.) Step Wise Protocols for Somatic Embryogenesis of Important Woody Plants. Forestry Sciences, vol 84. Cham: 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89483-6_2

Pullman G.S., Webb D.T. (1994) An embryo staging system for comparison of zygotic and somatic embryo development // TAPPI R&D Division biological sciences symposium. October 3, 1994. Minneapolis: 31–34.

Ramírez-Mosqueda M.A. (2022) Perspectives of Somatic Embryogenesis: Concluding Remarks // In: Ramírez-Mosqueda M.A. (ed.) Somatic Embryogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2527. Humana. New York, NY: 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2485-2_19

Singh H. (1981) Embryology of gymnosperms. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy XII. Gebr. Borntraeger. Berlin: 302.

Skinner D.R. (1992) Ovule and embryo development, seed production and germination in orchard grown control pollinated loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) from coastal South Carolina. University of Victoria. Victoria, BC, Canada: 89. [Master of Science Thesis]

Velisevich S., Popov A. (2024) Climate warming disturbances periodicity of Siberian stone pine seed production (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) // BIO Web of Conferences. 130: 01018. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413001018

Von Arnold S., Clapham D., Abrahamsson M. (2019) Chapter Five - Embryology in conifers // In: Cánovas F.M. (ed.) Advances in Botanical Research. Academic Press. Málaga, Spain: 157–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2018.11.005

Vuosku J., Sutela S., Tillman-Sutela E., Kauppi A., Jokela A., Sarjala T., Häggman H. (2009) Pine embryogenesis: many licences to kill for a new life // Plant signaling & behavior. 4(10): 928–932.

Williams C.G. (2008) Selfed embryo death in Pinus taeda: a phenotypic profile // New Phytologist. 178(1): 210–222.

Williams C.G. (2009) Conifer reproductive biology. Springer. Dordrecht: 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9602-0

Zhao H., Zhang J., Zhao J., Niu S. (2024) Genetic transformation in conifers: current status and future prospects // Forestry Research. 4(1): e010. https://doi.org/10.48130/forres-0024-0007

Zhu T., Wang J., Hu J., Ling J. (2022) Mini review: Application of the somatic embryogenesis technique in conifer species // Forestry Research. 2: 18. https://doi.org/10.48130/FR-2022-0018