ISSN: 2618-964X DOI: 10.31163/ecobiotech

Analysis of the functional diversity of broadleaf forests in the Republic of Tatarstan for carbon stock modeling

Year: 2026

Pages: 14-32

UDC: 577.352:577.115

Number: 1

Summary:

The study focuses on identifying predictors of carbon accumulation in ecosystems of the Carpino-Fagetea sylvaticae class in the broadleaf forests of the Republic of Tatarstan. The research object comprises 10 sample plots for which a set of phytosociological relevés, forest inventory measurements, and biomass assessments across the main community pools (tree stand, understory, deadwood, herb layer, litter, soil) was carried out. Indices of functional diversity (CWM, FDvar) were calculated for key functional traits, including leaf area and mass, specific leaf area, wood density, and plant height. To identify significant predictors, principal component analysis, correlation analysis, and linear regression were applied. The results show that carbon stocks in the studied phytocoenoses range from approximately 190 to 335 t C/ha, with a mean of about 270–300 t C/ha, and 76–86% of the carbon stored in the tree stand. Statistical analysis revealed that the most important predictor of carbon storage capacity is the community-weighted mean of specific leaf area (CWM_SLA), which explains more than 80% of the variation in carbon stocks. Based on regression modelling, the total carbon pool in the region’s broadleaf linden forests was estimated at about 35 Mt, and their annual carbon sequestration potential at around 210 thousand t/year, confirming the effectiveness of using plant functional traits for carbon balance monitoring and for planning low-carbon development strategies.        

Keywords:

carbon stocks, broadleaf forests, functional diversity, remote sensing, carbon sequestration

References:

  • GOST 23740-2016. (2017) Soils. Methods of laboratory determination of organic composition. Standartinform Publishing. Moscow: 9. (In Rus.)
  • Demakov Yu.P., Puryaev A.S., Chernykh V.L., Chernykh L.V. (2015) Allometric dependances application to 1 assess phytomass of various fractions of trees and simulation of their dynamics. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Series: Forest. Ecology. Nature Management. (2 (26)): 19–36. EDN: UBKTFJ (In Rus.)
  • Kozhevnikova M.V., Aukhadeev T.R., Avilov V.K., Tishin D.V., Usmanov B.M., Prokhorov V.E., Olchev A.V. (2025) Greenhouse gas fluxes at the forest monitoring site of the “Carbon-Povolzhye” polygon [Potoki parnikovykh gazov na lesnom monitoringovom uchastke poligona "Karbon-Povolzhye"]. In: Gulev S.K., Olchev A.V. (eds.) Carbon polygons: monitoring, geographic information systems, sequestration technologies [Karbonovyye poligony: monitoring, geoinformatsionnyye sistemy, sekvestratsionnyye tekhnologii]. Nauchnyy Mir Publishing. Moscow: 77–84. (In Rus.)
  • Martynenko S.N. (2004) Carbon deposition by upland oak forests of the Voronezh region [Deponirovaniye ugleroda nagornymi dubravami Voronezhskoy oblasti]. Actual Problems of the Forest Complex [Aktualnyye problemy lesnogo kompleksa]. (8): 96–98. EDN: UBMUND (In Rus.)
  • Martynenko S.N. (2005) Dendrochronological features of carbon deposition by oak stands of the central forest-steppe [Dendrokhronologicheskiye osobennosti deponirovaniya ugleroda dubovymi nasazhdeniyami tsentralnoy lesostepi]. Voronezh State Forestry Academy. Voronezh: 234. [Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Agricultural Sciences] (In Rus.)
  • Penman J., Gytarsky M., Hiraishi T. et al. (eds.) (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry [Rukovodyashchiye ukazaniya po effektivnoy praktike dlya zemlepolzovaniya, izmeneniy v zemlepolzovanii i lesnogo khozyaystva]. World Meteorological Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. (In Rus.)
  • Tarasov M.E. (1999) The role of coarse woody debris in the carbon balance of forest ecosystems of the Leningrad region [Rol krupnogo drevesnogo detrita v balanse ugleroda lesnykh ekosistem Leningradskoy oblasti]. St. Petersburg Research Institute of Forestry. St. Petersburg: 21. [Abstract of the Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Biological Sciences] EDN: ZKKCKR (In Rus.)
  • Uvarova S.S. (2005) Dynamics of phytomass reserves of linden trees on the example of the Achit forestry of the Sverdlovsk region [Dinamika zapasov fitomassy derevyev lipy na primere Achitskogo leskhoza Sverdlovskoy oblasti]. In: Forests of the Urals and management in them: collection of scientific papers, issue 26 [Lesa Urala i khozyaystvo v nikh: sbornik nauchnykh trudov, vypusk 26]. Ural State Forestry University Publishing. Ekaterinburg: 38–40. (In Rus.)
  • Uvarova S.S. (2006) Growth and phytomass of linden stands in the Sverdlovsk region [Rost i fitomassa drevostoyev lipy v Sverdlovskoy oblasti]. Ural State Forestry University. Ekaterinburg: 239. [Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Agricultural Sciences] EDN: NNVVSX (In Rus.)
  • Braun-Blanquet J. (1932) Plant sociology. The study of plant communities. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York and London.: xviii + 439.
  • Chapin F.S. (2003) Effects of plant traits on ecosystem and regional processes: a conceptual framework for predicting the consequences of global change. Annals of Botany. 91(4): 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg041 EDN: LXVFKT
  • Chave J., Andalo C., Brown S., Cairns M.A., Chambers J.Q., Eamus D., Fölster H., Fromard F., Higuchi N., Kira T. et al. (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia. 145(1): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x EDN: LSZMQH
  • Chave J., Coomes D., Jansen S., Lewis S.L., Swenson N.G., Zanne A.E. (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecology Letters. 12(4): 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x EDN: MHGAMH
  • Cornwell W.K., Cornelissen J.H.C., Amatangelo K., Dorrepaal E., Eviner V.T., Godoy O., Hobbie S.E., Hoorens B., Kurokawa H., Pérez‐Harguindeguy N. et al. (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecology Letters. 11(10): 1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x EDN: LLJZCB
  • Dı́az S., Cabido M. (2001) Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 16(11): 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2 EDN: ARJBVV
  • Forzieri G., Dakos V., McDowell N.G., Ramdane A., Cescatti A. (2022) Emerging signals of declining forest resilience under climate change. Nature. 608(7923): 534–539. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04959-9 EDN: COFVKR
  • Freschet G.T., Pagès L., Iversen C.M., Comas L.H., Rewald B., Roumet C., Klimešová J., Zadworny M., Poorter H., Postma J.A. et al. (2021) A starting guide to root ecology: strengthening ecological concepts and standardising root classification, sampling, processing and trait measurements. New Phytologist. 232(3): 973–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17572 EDN: UPQXPL
  • Gafurov A., Prokhorov V., Kozhevnikova M., Usmanov B. (2024) Forest community spatial modeling using machine learning and remote sensing data. Remote Sensing. 16(8): 1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081371 EDN: UBESCA
  • Garnier E., Cortez J., Billès G., Navas M.-L., Roumet C., Debussche M., Laurent G., Blanchard A., Aubry D., Bellmann A. et al. (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology. 85(9): 2630–2637. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0799
  • Grime J.P. (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology. 86(6): 902–910. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x
  • Hong P., Schmid B., De Laender F., Eisenhauer N., Zhang X., Chen H., Craven D., De Boeck H.J., Hautier Y., Petchey O.L. et al. (2022) Biodiversity promotes ecosystem functioning despite environmental change. Ecology Letters. 25(2): 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13936 EDN: XNIWSA
  • Joswig J.S., Wirth C., Schuman M.C., Kattge J., Reu B., Wright I.J., Sippel S.D., Rüger N., Richter R., Schaepman M.E. et al. (2021) Climatic and soil factors explain the two-dimensional spectrum of global plant trait variation. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 6(1): 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01616-8 EDN: QSCEHE
  • Kattge J., Bönisch G., Díaz S., Lavorel S., Prentice I.C., Leadley P., Tautenhahn S., Werner G.D.A., Aakala T., Abedi M. et al. (2020) TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access. Global Change Biology. 26(1): 119–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14904 EDN: BXAOPJ
  • Körner C. (2006) Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytologist. 172(3): 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01886.x EDN: LWMKIB
  • Krankina O.N., Harmon M.E. (1995) Dynamics of the dead wood carbon pool in northwestern Russian boreal forests. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 82(1–2): 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182836 EDN: QNJCHY
  • Laliberté E., Legendre P. (2010) A distance‐based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology. 91(1): 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1
  • Lavorel S., Garnier E. (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology. 16(5): 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x
  • Mason N.W.H., Mouillot D., Lee W.G., Wilson J.B. (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos. 111(1): 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13886.x
  • Mokany K., Ash J., Roxburgh S. (2008) Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. Journal of Ecology. 96(5): 884–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01395.x
  • Mouillot D., Graham N.A.J., Villéger S., Mason N.W.H., Bellwood D.R. (2013) A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 28(3): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004 EDN: RHXNOP
  • Mucina L., Bültmann H., Dierßen K., Theurillat J., Raus T., Čarni A., Šumberová K., Willner W., Dengler J., García R.G. et al. (2016) Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Applied Vegetation Science. 19(S1): 3–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12257 EDN: XLIMMN
  • Pascual U., Balvanera P., Anderson C.B., Chaplin-Kramer R., Christie M., González-Jiménez D., Martin A., Raymond C.M., Termansen M., Vatn A. et al. (2023) Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature. 620(7975): 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9 EDN: DZUCAP
  • Poorter L., McDonald I., Alarcón A., Fichtler E., Licona J., Peña‐Claros M., Sterck F., Villegas Z., Sass‐Klaassen U. (2010) The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductance for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species. New Phytologist. 185(2): 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03092.x EDN: NZNTEZ
  • Prokhorov V., Rogova T., Kozhevnikova M. (2017) Vegetation Database of Tatarstan. Phytocoenologia. 47(3): 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/2017/0172 EDN: PRXJYL
  • Rasse D.P., Rumpel C., Dignac M.-F. (2005) Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation. Plant and Soil. 269(1–2): 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-0907-y EDN: AFHNZN
  • Reich P.B., Tilman D., Isbell F., Mueller K., Hobbie S.E., Flynn D.F.B., Eisenhauer N. (2012) Impacts of Biodiversity Loss Escalate Through Time as Redundancy Fades. Science. 336(6081): 589–592. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217909 EDN: PLMONJ
  • Tilman D., Knops J., Wedin D., Reich P., Ritchie M., Siemann E. (1997) The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes. Science. 277(5330): 1300–1302. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5330.1300 EDN: COEXZL
  • Villéger S., Mason N.W.H., Mouillot D. (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology. 89(8): 2290–2301. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1206.1
  • Wright I.J., Reich P.B., Westoby M., Ackerly D.D., Baruch Z., Bongers F., Cavender-Bares J., Chapin T., Cornelissen J.H.C., Diemer M. et al. (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature. 428(6985): 821–827. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403 EDN: LIIMQJ
  • Zanne A.E., Lopez-Gonzalez G., Coomes D.A., Ilic J., Jansen S., Lewis S.L., Miller R.B., Swenson N.G., Wiemann M.C., Chave J. (2009) Data from: Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.234
Download pdf
up
ISSN: 2618-964X DOI: 10.31163/ecobiotech