ЭкоБиоТех

Метод культуры in vitro изолированных пыльников – один из перспективных биотехнологических подходов в селекционных исследованиях сельскохозяйственных культур. Основная проблема, снижающая эффективность применения данного метода и широкое внедрение его в селекционную практику – низкая отзывчивость инокулированных пыльников. В связи с этим вопросы, посвященные пониманию механизмов, лежащих в основе смены гаплоидными клетками пыльника программы развития актуальны и практически значимы, что особенно касается хозяйственно ценных злаков. Цель данной статьи – провести анализ работ, посвященных изучению различных факторов, влияющих на отзывчивость культивируемых in vitro пыльников злаков и дать оценку современного состояния в этой области исследований. Следует отметить, что в публикациях по анализируемой теме отсутствуют унифицированные термины, поэтому мы будем использовать термины, приведенные в работе [Круглова, 2009].

андроклиния, культура in vitro пыльников, отзывчивость, злаки

• Белинская Е.В. Наследование способности к андрогенезу in vitro у ярового ячменя // Цитология и генетика. 2008. Т. 42. № 4. С. 27–37.
• Белинская Е.В., Тымчук С.М., Дульнев П.Г., Деребизова О.Ю. Использование высокоамилозного крахмала кукурузы в питательной среде для культивирования пыльников ячменя // Физиология и биохимия культ. растений. 2009. Т. 41. № 6. С. 539– 546.
• Білинська О.В. Вплив умов вирощування донорних рослин та складу живильного середовища на ефективність отримання гаплоїдів ріпаку ярого в культурі пиляків in vitro // Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів. 2013. Т. 12. С. 190–194.
• Білинська О.В. Дульнєв П.Г. Морфогенетичний ефект і трофічні властивості хімічно модифікованого крохмалю Д-5аМ у культурі in vitro пиляків та ізольованих зародків ячменю ярого (Hordeum vulgare L.) // Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів. 2015. Т. 17. С. 107–111.
• Білинська О.В. Дульнєв П.Г. Вплив гелеутворюючого компонента живильного середовища на ефективність отримання гаплоїдів ячменю ярого (Hordeum vulgare L.) у культурі пиляків in vitro // Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів. 2014. Т. 15. С. 20–24.
• Зайцев Д.Ю., Сельдимирова О.А., Круглова Н.Н. Особенности индукции путей морфогенеза в культуре in vitro пыльников пшеницы // Клеточные культуры. 2006. Вып. 21. С. 54–61.
• Игнатова С.А. Клеточные технологии в растениеводстве, генетике и селекции возделываемых растений: задачи, возможности, разработки систем in vitro. Одесса: Астропринт, 2011. 224 с.
• Круглова Н.Н. Периодизация развития пыльника злаков как методологический аспект изучения андрогенеза in vitro // Известия РАН. Серия биол. 1999. № 3. С. 275–281.
• Круглова Н.Н. Унификация терминологии при разработке инновационной биотехнологии андроклинной гаплоидии in vitro // Физиология и биохимия культ. растений. 2009. Т. 41. № 5. С. 476–486.
• Круглова Н.Н., Батыгина Т.Б., Сельдимирова О.А. Морфогенетический потенциал спорогенных клеток пыльника злаков // Успехи соврем. биологии. 2000. Т. 120. № 5. С. 490–500.
• Круглова Н.Н. Микроспора злаков как модельная система для изучения путей морфогенеза: Автореф. дисс. … д-ра биол. наук. СПб., 2002. 48 с.
• Круглова Н.Н. Морфогенез в культуре пыльников пшеницы: эмбриологический подход. Уфа: Гилем, 2001. 203 с.
• Круглова Н.Н., Куксо П.А. Инициальная клетка андроклинии // Физиология и биохимия культ. раст. 2006. Т. 38. № 4. С. 279–291.
• Основы биотехнологии растений / Б.Р. Кулуев, Н.Н. Круглова, А.А. Зарипова, Р.Г. Фархутдинов. Уфа: РИЦ БашГУ, 2017. 244 с
• От микроспоры – к сорту / Т.Б. Батыгина, Н.Н. Круглова, В.Ю. Горбунова, Г.Е. Титова, О.А. Сельдимирова. М.: Наука. 2010. 174 с.
• Першина Л.А., Осадчая Т.С., Бадаева Е.Д., Белан И.А., Россеева Л.П. Изучение особенностей андрогенеза в культуре пыльников сортов и перспективной формы яровой мягкой пшеницы западносибирской селекции, различающихся наличием или отсутствием пшенично-чужеродных транслокаций // Вавилов. журн. генет. и селекции. 2013. Т. 17. № 1. С. 40–49.
• Сатарова Т.Н., Черчель В.Ю., Черенков А.В. Кукуруза: биотехнологические и селекционные аспекты гаплоидии. Днепропетровск: Новая идеология, 2013. 552 с.
• Суханов В.М. Андроклиния и ее особенности у пшеницы: Автореф. дис. … канд. биол. наук. Саратов, 1983. 24 с.
• Abd El-Fatah B.E.S., Sayed M.A., El-Sanusy S.A. Genetic analysis of anther culture response and identification of QTLs associated with response traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) // Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020. V. 47. № 12. P. 9289–9300. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-020-06007-z
• Arisandi D.P., Paradisa F.V., Sugiharto B., Avivi S., Fanata W.I.D. Effect of ethylene inhibitor, type of auxin, and type of sugar on anther culture of local East Java aromatic rice varieties // J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2020. V. 23. № 4. P. 367–373. DOI: 10.1007/s12892-020- 00045-6
• Asif M. Progress and Opportunities of Doubled Haploid Production. Cham; Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London: Springer, 2013. 75 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00732-8
• Asif M., Eudes F., Randhawa H., Amundsen E., Spaner D. Induction medium osmolality improves microspore embryogenesis in wheat and triticale // In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. – Plant. 2014. V.50. № 1. P. 121–126. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-013-9545-5
• Asif M., Eudes F., Randhawa H., Amundsen E., Spaner D. Phytosulfokine alpha enhances microspore embryogenesis in both triticale and wheat // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2014. V. № 1. P. 125–130. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-013-0379-y
• Babbar Sh.B., Kumari N., Mishra J.K. In vitro androgenesis: events preceding its cytological manifestation // Plant botechnology and molecular markers / Eds Srivastava P.S., Narula A., Srivastava Sh. New Delhi: Anamaya Publishers, 2004. P. 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3213-7
• Batygina T.B., Vasilyeva V.E. Periodization of development of reproductive structures. Critical periods // Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 2003. V. 45. № 1. P. 27–36.
• Begheyn R.F., Roulund N., Vangsgaard K., Kopecký D., Studer B. Inheritance patterns of the response to in vitro doubled haploid induction in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2017. V. 130. № 3. P. 667–679. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-017-1255-y
• Bednarek P.T., Orłowska R. Plant tissue culture environment as a switch-key of (epi)genetic changes Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2020. V. 140. № 3. P. 245–257. DOI: 10.1007/s11240- 019-01724-1
• Borderies G., Bechec M., Rossignol M., Lafitte C., Le Deunff E., Beckert M., Dumas C., Matthys-Rochon E. Characterisation of proteins secreted during maize microspore culture: arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) stimulate embryo development // Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 2004. 83. № 5. P. 205–212. DOI: 10.1078/0171-9335-00378
• Bossio E., Diaz Paleo A., del Vas M., Baroli I., Acevedo A., Rios R.D. Silencing of the glutathione biosynthetic pathway inhibits somatic embryogenesis in wheat // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2013. V. 112. № 2. P. 239–248. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-012-0228-4
• Chaikam V., Prasanna B.M. Doubled Haploid Technology for Rapid and Efficient Maize Breeding // Accelerated Plant Breeding / Eds Gosal S., Wani S. V. 1. Cham: Springer, 2020. 257–292. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41866-3_11
• Clement C., Sangwan R.S., Sangwan-Norreel B. Microspore embryo induction and development in higher plants: cytological and ultrastructural aspects // Haploids in Crop Improvement II. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. V. 56. / Eds Don Palmer C., Keller W.A., Kasha K.J. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2005. P. 53–72. DOI: 10.1007/3-540- 26889-8_4
• Corral-Martínez P., Seguí-Simarro J.M. Efficient production of callus-derived doubled haploids through isolated microspore culture in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) // Euphytica. 2012. V. 187. № 1. P. 47–61. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-012-0715-z
• Сhu C.-C. The N6 medium and its application to anther culture of cereal crops // Plant Tissue Culture: Proc. Symp. – Peking: Sci. Press, 1978. P. 43–45.
• Chuang Ch.-Ch., Ouyang T.-W. A set of potato media for wheat anther culture // Sympos. on Plant Tissue Culture: Proceed. Peking: Sci. Press., 1978. P. 52–56.
• Coskun Y., Savaskan C. Advances in isolated microspore culture for the production of plant regeneration of Turkish durum wheat genotypes // J. Biotechnol. 2012. V. 161. Suppl. P. 47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.07.155
• Datta S.K. Androgenic haploids: factors controlling development and its application in crop improvement // Curr. Sci. 2005. V. 89. № 11. P. 870–1878.
• De Gara L., de Pinto M.C., Moliterni V.M.C., Egidio M.G.D. Redox regulation and storage processes during maturation in kernels of Triticum durum // J. Exp. Bot. 2003. V. 54. № 381. 249–258. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg021
• Dong X., Xu X., Miao J., Li L., Zhang D., Mi X., Liu C., Tian X., Melchinger A.E., Chen S. Fine mapping of qhir1 influencing in vivo haploid induction in maize // Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013. V. 126. № 7. P. 1713–1720. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2086-9
• Dunwell J.M. Haploids in flowering plants: origins and exploitation // Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010. V. 8. № 4. P. 377–424. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00498.x
• Dwivedi S.L., Britt A.B., Tripathi L., Sharma S., Upadhyaya H.D., Ortiz R. Haploids: constraints and opportunities in plant breeding // Biotechnol. Adv. 2015. V. 33. № 6. P. 812– 829. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.07.001
• Dhooghe E., Van Laere K., Eeckhaut T., Leus L., Van Huylenbroeck J. Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2011. V. 104. № 3. P. 359–373 DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9786-5
• Doubled Haploidy in Model and Recalcitrant Species / Ed. Segui-Simarro J.M. Front. Plant Sci. 2016. V. 6. 119 p. DOI: 10.3389/978-2-88919-783-5
• El-Hennawy M.A., Abdalla A.F., Shafey S.A., Al-Ashkar I.M. Production of doubled haploid wheat lines (Triticum aestivum L.) using anther culture technique // Ann. Agricult.l Sci. 2011. 56. № 2. P. 63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.aoas.2011.05.008
• Ellis M., Egelund J., Schultz C.J. et al. Arabinogalactan-proteins: key regulators at the cell surface? // Plant Physiol. 2010. V. 153. № 2. P. 403–419. DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.156000
• Esteves P., Belzile F.J. TDZ in Cereal Gametic Embryogenesis // Thidiazuron: From Urea Derivative to Plant Growth Regulator / Eds Ahmad N., Faisal M. Singapore: Springer, 2018. 159–174. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8004-3_7
• Ferrie A.M.R., Caswell K.L. Isolated microspore culture techniques and recent progress for haploid and doubled haploid plant production // Plant Cell. Tiss. Org. Cult. 2011. V. 104. №
• P. 301–309. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9800-y
• Ferrie A.M.R., Irmen K.I., Beattie A.D., Rossnagel B.G. Isolated microspore culture of oat (Avena sativa L.) for the production of doubled haploids: effect of pre-culture and post- culture conditions // Plant Cell. Tiss. Org. Cult. 2014. V. 116. № 1. P. 89–96. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-013-0385-0
• Ferrie A.M.R., Mollers C. Haploids and doubled haploids in Brassica spp. for genetic and genomic research // Plant Cell. Tiss. Org. Cult. 2011. V. 104. № 3. P. 375–386. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9831-4
• Gamborg O.L., Miller R.A, Ojima K. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells // Experimental Cell Res. 1968. V. 50. № 1. P. 151–158. DOI: 10.1016/0014- 4827(68)90403-5
• Garda M., Hale B., Rao N., Lowe M., Bright M., Goodling S., Phillips G.C. Soybean androgenesis I: identification of pyramidal stressors in anther cultures that sustain cell divisions and embryo formation from isolated microspore cultures// In Vitro Cell, Dev. Biol. – Plant. 2020. V. 56. № 4. P. 415–429. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-020-10074-z
• Germana M.A. Anther culture for haploid and doubled haploid production // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2011. V. 104. № 3. P. 283–300. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9852-z
• Goralski G., Rozier F., Matthys-Rochon E., Przywara L. Cytological features of various microspore derivatives appearing during culture of isolated maize microspores // Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 2005. V. 47. № 1. P. 75–83.
• Gorbunova, V.Y., Kruglova, N.N. & Abramov, S.N. The Induction of Androgenesis in vitro in Spring Soft Wheat. Balance of Exogenous and Endogenous Phytohormones // Biology Bulletin. 2001. V. 28. № 1. P.25–30. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026602603527
• Grewal R.K., Lulsdorf M., Croser J., Ochatt S., Vandenberg A., Warkentin T.D. Doubled- haploid production in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): role of stress treatments // Plant Cell Rep. 2009. V. 28. № 8. P. 1289–1299. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-009-0731-1
• Guasmi F., Elfalleh W., Hannachi Y. et al. Influence of various physical parameters on anther culture of barley // J. Plant Nutr. 2013. V. 36. № 5. P. 836–847. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2012.759230
• Guo Y.D., Pulli S. Isolated microspore culture and plant regeneration in rye (Secale cereale L.) // Plant Cell Rep. 2000. V. 19. № 9. P. 875–880. DOI: 10.1007/s002990000194
• Hu H., Schrag T.A., Peis R., Unterseer S., Schipprack W., Chen S., Lai J., Yan J., Prasanna B.M., Nair S.K., Chaikam V., Rotarenco V., Shatskaya O.A., Zavalishina A., Scholten S., Schön C.-C., Melchinger A.E. The Genetic Basis of Haploid Induction in Maize Identified with a Novel Genome-Wide Association Method // Genetics. 2016. V. 202. № 4. Р. 1267- 1276. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.184234
• Grosse B.A., Deimling S., Geiger H.H. Mapping of genes for anther culture ability in rye by molecular markers // Vortr Pflanzenzьchtung. 1997. № 35. P. 282–283.
• Islam S.M.S., Tuteja N. Enhancement of androgenesis by abiotic stress and other pretreatments in major crop species // Plant Sci. 2012. V. 182. P. 134–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.10.001
• Ilyushko M.V., Guchenko S.S., Romashova M.V. Intracallus and Intercallus Morphological Variability of Rice Doubled Haploids Obtained in In Vitro Androgenesis // Russ. Agricult. Sci 2021. V. 47. № 1. P. 11–16. DOI: 10.3103/S1068367421010080
• Ilyushko M.V., Romashova M.V. Formation of Rice Tetraploids in In Vitro Androgenesis // Russ. Agricult. Sci 2020. V. 46. № 4. P. 332–336. DOI: 10.3103/S1068367420040084
• Kahrizi D., Mahmood S., Bakhshi Khanik G., Mirzaei M. Effect of genotype on androgenesis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) // Biharean Biologist. 2011. V. 5. № 2. P. 132-134.
• Krzewska M., Czyczyło-Mysza I., Dubas E. Gołębiowska-Pikania G., Golemiec E., Stojałowski S., Chrupek M., Zur I. Quantitative trait loci associated with androgenic responsiveness in triticale (x Triticosecale Wittm.) anther culture // Plant Cell Rep. 2012. V. № 11. P. 2099–2108. DOI: 10.1007/s0029 9-012-1320-2
• Kumari M., Clarke H.J., Small I., Siddique K.H. Albinism in plants: a major bottleneck in wide hybridization, androgenesis and doubled haploid culture // Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2009. V. P. 393–409. DOI: 10.1080/07352680903133252
• Letarte J., Simion E., Miner M., Kasha K.J. Arabinogalactans and arabinogalactan-proteins induce embryogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) microspore culture // Plant Cell Rep. 2006. V. 25. № 12. P. 691–698. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-005-0013-5
• Li H., Devaux P. Enhancement of microspore culture efficiency of recalcitrant barley genotypes // Plant Cell Rep. 2001. V. 20. № 6. P. 475–481. DOI: 10.1007/s002990100368
• Maharani A., Fanata W.I.D., Laeli F.N., Kim K.-M., Handoyo T. Callus Induction and Regeneration from Anther Cultures of Indonesian Indica Black Rice Cultivar// J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2020. V. 23. № 1. P. 21–28. DOI: 10.1007/s12892-019-0322-0
• Makowska K., Kałużniak M., Oleszczuk S., Zimny J., Czaplicki A., Konieczny R. Arabinogalactan proteins improve plant regeneration in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) anther culture // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2017. V. 131. № 2. P. 247–257. DOI: 10.1007/s11240- 017-1280-x
• Loyola-Vargas V.M., Ochoa-Alejo N. Somatic embryogenesis. An Overview // Somatic embryogenesis: fundamental aspects and applications / Eds Loyola-Vargas V.M., Ochoa- Alejo N. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. P. 1–8. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319- 33705-0
• Lichter R. Anther culture of Brassica napus L. in a liquid culture medium // Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1981. V. 103. № 3. P. 229–237. DOI: 10.1016/S0044-328X(81)80155-9
• Maraschin S.F., Caspers M., Potokina E., Wülfert F., Graner A., Spaink H.P., Wang M. cDNA array analysis of stress-induced gene expression in barley androgenesis // Physiol. Plant. 2006. V. 127. № 4. P. 535–550. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00673.x
• Maraschin S.F., de Priester W., Spaink H.P. et al. Androgenic switch: an example of plant embryogenesis from the male gametophyte perspective // J. Exp. Bot. 2005a. V. 56. №. 417. 1711–1726. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri190
• Mayakaduwa, D.M.R.G., Silva, T.D. In vitro response of Indica rice microspores subjected to cold stress: a cytological and histological perspective // In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-021-10177-1
• Mishra R, Rao GJN (2016) In-vitro androgenesis in rice: advantages, constraints and future prospects // Rice Sci. 2016. V. 23. № 2. P. 57–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2016.02.001
• Muсoz-Amatriain M., Castillo A.M., Chen X.W., Cistue L., Valles M.P. Identification and validation of QTLs for green plant percentage in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) anther culture // Mol. Breed. 2008. V. 22. № 1. P. 119–129. DOI: 10.1007/s1103 2-008-9161-y
• Murashige T., Skoog F. A revised medium for growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures // Physiol. Plant. 1962. V. 15. № 3. P. 473–497. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399- 3054.1962.tb08052.x
• Neumann KH., Kumar A., Imani J. Some Endogenous and Exogenous Factors in Cell Culture Systems // Plant Cell and Tissue Culture – A Tool in Biotechnology. Cham: Springer, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49098-0_8
• Ochatt S., Pech C., Grewal R., Conreux C., Lulsdorf M., Jacas L. Abiotic stress enhances androgenesis from isolated microspores of some legume species (Fabaceae) // J. Plant Physiol. 2009. V. 166. № 12. P. 1314–1328. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.01.011
• Orłowska R., Bednarek P.T. Precise evaluation of tissue culture-induced variation during optimization of in vitro regeneration regime in barley // Plant Mol. Biol. 2020. V. 103. № 1–2. 33–50. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-020-00973-5
• Paire A., Devaux P., Lafitte C., Dumas C., Matthys-Rochon E. Proteins produced by barley microspores and their derived androgenic structures promote in vitro zygotic maize embryo formation // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2003. V. 73. № 2. P. 167–176. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022805623167
• Patel M., Darvey N.L., Marshall D.R., Berry J.O. Optimization of culture conditions for improved plant regeneration efficiency from wheat microspore culture // Euphytica. 2004. 140. № 3. P. 197–204. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-004-3036-z
• Portemer V., Renne Ch., Guillebaux A., Mercier R. Large genetic screens for gynogenesis and androgenesis haploid inducers in Arabidopsis thaliana failed to identify mutants // Front. Plant Sci. 2015. V.6: 147. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00147
• Pourmohammad, A., Moieni, A., Dehghani, H., Monfared S.R. Field-grown donor plants and arabinogalactan proteins improve microspore embryogenesis in sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) // In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2021. V. 57. № 3. P. 510–518. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-020-10152-2
• Redha A., Suleman P. Effects of exogenous application of polyamines on wheat anther cultures // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2011. V. 105. № 3. P. 345-353. DOI: 10.1007/s11240- 010-9873-7
• Ren J., Wu P., Trampe B., Tian X., Lubberstedt T., Chen Sh. Novel technologies in doubled haploid line development // Plant Biotechnol. Journ. 2017. V. 15. № 11. P. 1361–1370. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12805
• Rivas-Sendra A., Corral-Martínez P., Camacho-Fernández C., Porcel R., Seguí-Simarro J.M. Effects of growth conditions of donor plants and in vitro culture environment in the viability and the embryogenic response of microspores of different eggplant genotypes // Euphytica. 2020. V. 216. № 11: 167. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-020-02709-4
• Salas P., Rivas-Sendra A., Prohens J., Seguı´-Simarro J.M. Influence of the stage for anther excision and heterostyly in embryogenesis induction from eggplant anther cultures // Euphytica. 2012. V. 184. № 2. P. 235–250. DOI 10.1007/s10681-011-0569-9
• Salvo S., Cook J., Carlson A.R., Hirsch C.N., Kaeppler S.M., Kaeppler H.F. Genetic fine- mapping of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) associated with embryogenic tissue culture response and plant regeneration ability in maize (Zea mays L.) // Plant Genome. 2018. V. 11. № 2: 170111. DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2017.12.0111
• Samantaray S.J.A., Nicolas K.L.C., Katara J.L., Verma R.L., Parameswaran C., Devanna B.N., Kumar A., Dash B., Bhuyan S.S. Doubled Haploids in Rice Improvement: Approaches, Applications, and Future Prospects // Rice Improvement / Eds Ali J., Wani S.H. Cham: Springer, 2021. P. 425–447. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-66530-2_12 Segui-Simarro J.M. Androgenesis Revisited // Bot. Rev. 2010. V. 76. № 3. P. 377–404. DOI: 10.1007/s12229-010-9056-6
• Segui-Simarro J.M., Nuez F. How microspores transform into haploid embryos: changes associated with embryogenesis induction and microspore-derived embryogenesis // Physiol. Plant. 2008. V. 134. № 1. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01113.x
• Sidhu P.K., Davis P.A. Regeneration of fertile green plants from oat isolated microspore culture // Plant Cell Rep. 2009. V. 28. № 4. P. 571–577. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-009-0684-4
• Soriano M., Li H., Boutilier K. Microspore embryogenesis: establishment of embryo identity and pattern in culture // Plant Reprod. 2013. V. 26. №3. P. 181-196. DOI: 10.1007/s00497- 013-0226-7
• Stasolla C. Glutathione redox regulation of in vitro embryogenesis // Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010. V. 48. № 5. P. 319–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.10.007
• Testillano P.S. Microspore embryogenesis: targeting the determinant factors of stress-induced cell reprogramming for crop improvement. J. Exp. Bot. 2019. V. 70. № 11. P. 2965–2978. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery464
• Testillano P.S., Raminez C., Domenech J., Coronado M.-J., Vergne Ph., Matthys-Rochon E., Risueño M.C. Young microspore-derived maize embryos show two domains with defined features also present in zygotic embryogenesis // Int. J. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2002. V. 46. № 8. 1035–1047.
• Torp A.M., Andersen S.B. Albinism in microspore culture // Advances in haploid production in higher plants / Eds Touraev A., Forster B.P., Jain S.M. Berlin: Springer, 2009. P. 155–160. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8854-4
• Touraev A., Vicente O., Heberle-Bors E. Initiation of microspore embryogenesis by stress // Trends Plant Sci. 1997.V. 2. № 8. P. 297–302. DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)89951-7
• Tripathi M. Synthetic seed technology and its applications: a review // Int. J. Plant Biotech. 2017. V. 3. № 1. P. 11–16. DOI: 10.37628/ijpb.v3i1.157
• Warchoł M., Czyczyło-Mysza I., Marcińska I., Dziurka K., Noga A., Skrzypek E. The effect of genotype, media composition, pH and sugar concentrations on oat (Avena sativa L.) doubled haploid production through oat × maize crosses // Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018. V. 40. № 5: 93. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-018-2669-9
• Weigt D., Siatkowski I., Magaj M., Tomkowiak A., Nawracała J. Impact of Ionic Liquids on Induction of Wheat Microspore Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration // Agronomy. 2020. 10. № 6: 839. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10060839
• Wojnarowiez G., Caredda S., Devaux P., Sangwan R., Clement C. Barley anther culture: assessment of carbohydrate effects on embryo yield, green plant production and differential plastid development in relation with albinism // J. Plant Physiol. 2004. V. 161. № 6. P. 747– 755. DOI: 10.1078/0176-1617-01061
• Yan G., Liu H., Wang H., Lu Zh., Wang Y., Mullan D., Hamblin J., Liu Ch. Accelerated Generation of Selfed Pure Line Plants for Gene Identification and Crop Breeding // Front. Plant Sci. 2017. V. 8: 1786. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01786
• Yerzhebayeva R.S., Abekova A.M., Ainebekova B.A., Urazaliyev K.R., Bazylova T.A., Daniyarova A.K., Bersimbayeva G.Kh. Influence of different concentrations of ascorbic and gibberellic acids and pH of medium on embryogenesis and regeneration in anther culture of spring triticale // Cytol. Genet. 2017. V. 51. 3 6. P. 448–454. DOI: 10.3103/S0095452717060032
• Zieliński K., Krzewska M., Żur I., Juzoń K., Kopeć P., Nowicka A., Moravčiková J., Skrzypek E., Dubas E. The effect of glutathione and mannitol on androgenesis in anther and isolated microspore cultures of rye (Secale cereale L.) // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2020. 140. № 3. P. 577–592. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-019-01754-9
• Żur I., Krzewska M., Dubas E., Gołębiowska-Pikania G., Janowiak F., Stojałowski S. Molecular mapping of loci associated with abscisic acid accumulation in triticale (×Triticosecale Wittm.) anthers in response to low temperature stress inducing androgenic development // Plant Growth Regul. 2012. V. 68. № 3. P. 483–492. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-012-9738-7
• Zur I., Dubas E., Golemiec E., Szechyńska-Hebda M., Gołebiowska G., Wedzony M. Stress-related variation in antioxidative enzymes activity and cell metabolism efficiency associated with embryogenesis induction in isolated microspore culture of triticale (xTriticosecale Wittm.) // Plant Cell Rep. 2009. V. 28. № 8. P. 1279–1287. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-009-0730-2
• Żur I., Dubas E., Krzewska M., Kopeć P., Nowicka A., Surówka E., Gawrońska K., Gołębiowska G., Juzoń K., Malaga S. Triticale and barley microspore embryogenesis induction requires both reactive oxygen species generation and efficient system of antioxidative defence // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2021. V. 145, № 2. P. 347–366. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-021-02012-7