ЭкоБиоТех

В статье приведен краткий обзор литературных и собственных работ, посвященных особенностям становления полярности и симметрии при формировании специфичной трехмерной структуры зародышей in vivo и эмбриоидов in vitro. Особое внимание уделяется андроклинному эмбриоидогенезу in vitro, как перспективной модельной системе для изучения различных аспектов морфогенеза растений. Рассматриваются клеточные и цитофизиологические факторы, влияющие на становление полярности и симметрии в процессе развития зародыша/эмбриоида. Обсуждается ключевая роль транспорта и распределения ИУК в формировании зародыша/эмбриоида

полярность, симметрия, эмбриогенез in vivo, эмбриоидогенез in vitro, паттерны клеточных делений, полярный транспорт ауксина

• Батыгина Т.Б. Эмбриология пшеницы. Л.: Колос, 1974. 206 с.
• Батыгина Т.Б. Хлебное зерно: атлас. Л.: Наука. 1987. 281 с.
• Батыгина Т.Б. Биология развития растений. Симфония жизни. СПб.: ДЕАН, 2014. 764 с.
• Батыгина Т.Б., Васильева В.Е. Размножение растений. СПб.: Изд-во Санкт-Петербургского университета, 2002. 232 с.
• Галин И.Р., Сельдимирова О.А. Распределение эндогенной ИУК в полиэмбриоидах in vitro у пшеницы на разных этапах развития: данные иммуногистохимического анализа // Экобиотех. 2019. Т. 2. № 1. С. 63–74. DOI: 10.31163/2618-964X-2019-2-1-63-74.
• Гамбург К.З., Рекославская Н.И., Швецов С.Г. Ауксины в культурах тканей и клеток растений. Новосибирск: Наука, 1990. 243 с.
• Круглова Н.Н. Морфогенез в культуре пыльников пшеницы: эмбриологический подход. Уфа: Гилем. 2001. 203 с.
• Круглова Н.Н., Куксо П.А. Стрессовая индукция андроклинии // Успехи соврем. биол. 2006. Т. 126. № 3. С. 275–285.
• Медведев С.С. Физиологические основы полярности растений. СПб.: Кольна. 1996. 159 с.
• Медведев С.С. Механизмы формирования и физиологическая роль полярности в растениях // Физиология растений. 2012. Т. 59. № 4. С. 543–555.
• Медведев С.С., Шарова Е.И. Биология развития растений. Т. 1. Начала биологии развития растений. Фитогормоны. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2011. 256 с.
• От микроспоры к сорту / Батыгина Т.Б., Круглова Н.Н., Горбунова В.Ю., Титова Г.Е., Сельдимирова О.А. М.: Наука, 2010. 174 с.
• Поддубная-Арнольди В.А. Цитоэмбриология покрытосеменных растений. Основы и перспективы. М.: Наука, 1976. 508 с.
• Розов С.М., Загорская А.А., Дейнеко Е.В., Шумный В.К. Ауксин: биосинтез, метаболизм, транспорт // Успехи соврем. биол. 2013. Т. 133. № 1. С. 50–62.
• Сельдимирова О.А. Гистохимический анализ динамики содержания крахмала в микроспориальных эмбриоидах in vitro у яровой мягкой пшеницы // Известия Уфимского НЦ РАН. 2013. № 2. C. 62–66.
• Сельдимирова О.А., Галин И.Р. К вопросу о формировании полиэмбриоидов в культуре in vitro пыльников пшеницы // Известия Самарского НЦ РАН. 2011. Т. 13. № 5-3. С. 188–190.
• Сельдимирова О.А., Галин И.Р. Цито-гистологический анализ особенностей морфогенеза полиэмбриоидов в культуре in vitro пыльников пшеницы // Вестник Башкирского гос. аграрного ун-та. 2013. № 1 (25). С. 39–41.
• Сельдимирова О.А., Титова Г.Е., Круглова Н.Н. Андроклинные «сиамские зародыши» пшеницы in vitro // Известия Уфимского НЦ РАН. 2015. № 4 (1). С. 137–142.
• Сельдимирова О.А., Титова Г.Е., Круглова Н.Н. Комплексный морфолого- гистологический подход к изучению морфогенных структур в культуре in vitro пыльников  пшеницы  //  Известия РАН.  Серия биологическая.  2016.  № 2. С. 155–161.
• Титова Г.Е., Сельдимирова О.А., Круглова Н.Н., Галин И.Р., Батыгина Т.Б. Феномен «сиамских зародышей» у злаков in vivo и in vitro: кливажная полиэмбриония и фасциации // Онтогенез. 2016. Т. 47. № 3. С. 152–169. DOI: 10.7868/S047514501603006X
• Чеботарь А.А. Эмбриология кукурузы. Кишинев: Штиинца, 1972. 384 с.
• Эмбриологические основы андроклинии пшеницы: атлас / Н.Н. Круглова, Т.Б. Батыгина, В.Ю. Горбунова, Г.Е. Титова, О.А. Сельдимирова. М.: Наука. 2005. 99 с.
• Яковлев М.С., Снегирев Д.П. Влияние ростовых веществ на образование многозародышевых зерновок у пшеницы  //  Ботан. журнал.  1954.  Т. 39. № 2. 187–194.
• Aionesei T., Touraev A., Heberle-Bors E. Pathways to microspore embryogenesis // Biotechnol. Agr. Forest. 2005. V. 56. P. 11–34.
• Auxin and Its Role in Plant Development / Eds Zazimalova E., Petrasek J., Benkova E. Springer-Verlag: Wien, 2014. 444 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1526-8
• Bakos F., Szabo L., Olmedilla A., Barnabas B. Histological comparison between wheat embryos developing in vitro from isolated zygotes and those developing in vivo // Sex. Plant Reprod. 2009. V. 22. № 1. P. 15–25. DOI: 10.1007/s00497-008-0087-7
• Barany I., Fadon B., Risueno M.C., Testillano P.S. Cell wall components and pectin esterification levels as markers of proliferation and differentiation events during pollen development and pollen embryogenesis in Capsicum annuum L. // J. Exp. Bot. 2010. 61. № 4. P. 1159–1175. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp392
• Belanger K.D., Quatrano R.S. Polarity: the role of localized secretion // Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 2000. V. 3. № 1. P. 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00043-6
• Bennett M., Marchant A., Green H., May S., Ward S.,Millner P., Walker A.R., Schulz В., Feldmann K.A. Arabidopsis AUX1 gene: a permease-like regulator of root gravitropism // Science. 1996. V. 273. № 5277. P. 948–950. DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5277.948
• Blakeslee J., Bandyopadhyay A., Lee O.-K., Mravec J.,Boosaree T.B., Sauer M., Makam S., Cheng Y., Bouchard R., Adamec J., Geisler M., Nagashima A., Sakai T.,Martinoia E., Friml J., Peer W., Murphy A. Interactions among PIN-FORMED and P-Glycoprotein auxin transporters in Arabidopsis // Plant Cell. 2007. V. 19. № 1. P. 131–147. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.040782
• Bommert P., Werr W. Gene expression patterns in the maize caryopsis: clues to decisions in embryo and endosperm development // Gene. 2001. V. 271. № 2. P. 131–142. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00503-0
• Bonet F., Olmedilla A. Structural changes during early embryogenesis in wheat pollen // Protoplasma. 2000. V. 211. № 1–2. P. 94–102. DOI: 10.1007/BF01279902
• Bronsema F.B.F, Redig P., van Oostveen W.F.J., van Onckelen H.A., van Lammeren A.A.M. Uptake and biochemical analysis of 2,4-D in cultured zygotic embryos of Zea mays L. // J. Plant Physiol. 1996. V. 149. № 3-4. P. 363–371.
• Bronsema F.B.F., van Oostveen W.J.F., Prinsen E., van Lammeren A.A.M. Distribution of [14C] dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in cultured zygotic embryos of Zea mays L. // Plant Growth Regul. 1998. V. 17. № 2. P. 81–88.
• Bronsema F.B.F., van Oostveen W.J.F., van Lammeren A.A.M. Influence of 2,4-D, TIBA and 3,5-D on the growth response of cultured maize embryos // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2001. V. 65. № 1. P. 45–56. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010605519845
• Castillo A., Valles M., Cistue L. Comparison of anther and isolated microspore cultures in barley. Effects of culture density and regeneration medium // Euphytica. 2000. V. 113.
• № 1. P. 1–8. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003937530907
• Chen Q.F., Wang C.L., Lu Y.M., Shen M., Afza R., Duren M.V., Brunner H. Anther culture in connection with induced mutations for rice improvement // Euphytica. 2001. 120. № 3. P. 401–408. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017518702176
• Choi Y.E., Katsumi M., Sano H. Triiodobenzoic acid, an auxin polar transport inhibitor, suppresses somatic embryo formation and postembryonic shoot/root development in Eleutherococcus senticosus // Plant Science. 2001. V. 160. № 6. P. 1183–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00357-0
• Choi Y.E., Kim H.S., Soh W.Y., Yang D.C. Developmental and structural aspects of somatic embryos formed on medium containing 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid // Plant Cell Rep. 1997. V.16. № 11. P. 738–744. DOI: 10.1007/s002990050312
• Chung-Shen K., Wenliang L., Yao-Lin K. Corn (Zea mays L.): Production of pure lines through anther culture // Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. 1986. V. 2. № 1. 168–180. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-61625-9_10
• Cordewener J.H.G., Busink R.,Traas J.A., Custers J.B.M., Dons H.J.M., van Lookeren Campagne M.M. Induction of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. is accompanied by specific changes in protein synthesis // Planta. 1994. V. 195. № 1. 50–56. DOI: 10.1007/BF00206291
• Damerval C., Jabbour F., Nadot S., Citerne H.L. Evolution of Symmetry in Plants // Evolutionary Developmental Biology / Eds.: L. Nuño de la Rosa, G.B. Müller. Springer, Cham: 2021. P. 715732. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32979-6_59
• Dodeman V.L., Ducreux G., Kreis M. Zygotic embryogenesis versus somatic embryogenesis // J. Exp. Bot. 1997. V. 48. № 313. P. 1493–1509.
• Duarte-Aké F., Nic-Can G., De-la-Peña C. Somatic Embryogenesis: Polycomb Complexes Control Cell-to-Embryo Transition // Epigenetics in Plants of Agronomic Importance: Fundamentals and Applications / Eds Alvarez-Venegas R., De-la-Peña C., Casas-Mollano J.A. Springer, Cham, 2019. P. 339–354. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030- 14760-0_13
• Dubas E., Custers J., Kieft H.,Wędzony M., van Lammeren A.A.M. Microtubule configurations and nuclear DNA synthesis during initiation of suspensor-bearing embryos from Brassica napus cv. Topas microspores // Plant Cell Rep. 2011. V. 30. № 11. 2105–2116. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-011-1117-8
• Dubas E., Custers J., Kieft H., Wędzony M., Van Lammeren A.A.M. Characterization of polarity development through 2- and 3-D imaging during the initial phase of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. // Protoplasma. 2014. V. 251. № 1. P. 103–113. DOI: 10.1007/s00709-013-0530-y
• Dubas E., Wedzony M., Petrovska B., Salaj J., Zur I. Cell structural reorganization during induction of androgenesis in isolated microspore cultures of Triticale (xTriticosecale Wittm.) // Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 2010. V. 52. № 1. P. 73–86.
• Dunwell J.M. Haploids in flowering plants: origins and exploitation // Plant Biotechnol. 2010. V. 8. № 4. P. 377–424. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00498.x
• Elhiti M., Stasolla C. Ectopic expression of the Brassica SHOOTMERISTEMLESS attenuates the deleterious effects of the auxin transport inhibitor TIBA on somatic embryo number and morphology // Plant Sci. 2011. V. 180. № 2. P. 383–390. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.10.014
• Elhiti M., Stasolla C., Wang A. Molecular regulation of plant somatic embryogenesis //  In Vitro  Cell.  Dev.Biol.—Plant.  2013.  V.  49,  №  6.  P.  631–642. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-013-9547-3
• El-Tantawy A.A., Solis M.T., Costa M.L., Coimbra S.,. Risueño M.C, Testillano P.S. Arabinogalactan protein profiles and distribution patterns during microspore embryogenesis and pollen development in Brassica napus // Plant Reprod. 2013. V. 26. 231-243. DOI: 10.1007/s00497-013-0217-8
• Erdelska O., Vidovencova Z. Cleavage polyembryony in maize // Sex. Plant Reprod. 1992. V. 5. № 3. P. 224–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189815
• Erdelska O., Vidovencova Z. Cleavage polyembryony in vivo and in vitro // Biol. Plant. 1994. V. 36. № 3. P. 329–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920926
• Ferguson J.D., McEwan J.M. The Chemical induction of supernumerary shoots in the developing embryos of wheat //Physiol. Plant. 1970. V. 23. № 1. P. 18–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1970.tb06387.x
• Fischer C., Neuhaus G. Influence of auxin on the establishment of bilateral symmetry in monocots // Plant J. 1996. V. 9. № 5. P. 659–669. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365- 313X.1996.9050659.x
• Fischer C., Speth V., Fleig-Eberenz S., Neuhaus G. Induction of zygotic polyembryos in wheat: Influence of auxin polar transport // Plant Cell. 1997. V. 9. № 10. P. 1767–1780. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.9.10.1767
• Fischer-Iglesias C., Sundberg B., Neuhaus G., Jones A.M. Auxin distribution and transport during embryonic pattern formation in wheat // Plant J. 2001. V. 26. № 2. P. 115–129. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01013.x
• Friml J., Vieten A., Sauer M., Weijers D., Schwarz H., Hamann T., Offringa R., Jürgens
• Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis // Nature. 2003. V. 426. № 6963. P. 147–153. DOI: 10.1038/nature02085
• Forestan C., Meda S., Varotto S. ZmPIN1-mediated auxin transport is related to cellular differentiation during maize embryogenesis and endosperm development // Plant Physiol. 2010. V. 152. № 3. P. 1373–1390. DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.150193
• Garcia C., Furtado de Almeida A.-A., Costa M., Britto D., Valle R., Royaert S., Marelli J.P. Abnormalities in somatic embryogenesis caused by 2,4 -D: an overview // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2019. V. 1374. № 2. P. 193–212. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-019-01569-8
• Gervais C., Newcomb W., Simmonds D. Rearrangement of the actin filament and microtubule cytoskeleton during induction of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus  L.  cv.  Topas  //  Protoplasma.  2000.  V.  213.  №  3–4.  P.  194–202. DOI: 10.1007/BF01282157
• Guillon F., Larre C., Petipas F., Berger A., Moussawi J., Rogniaux H., Santoni A., Saulnier L., Jamme F., Miquel M. A comprehensive overview of grain development in Brachypodium distachyon variety Bd21 // J. Exp. Bot. 2012. V. 63. № 2. P. 739–755. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err298
• Hable W.E., Hart P.E. Signaling mechanisms in the establishment of plant and fucoid algal  polarity  //  Mol.  Reprod.  Dev.  2010.  V.  77.  №  9.  P.  751–758. DOI: 10.1002/mrd.21199
• Hadfi K., Speth V., Neuhaus G. Auxin-induced developmental patterns in Brassica juncea  embryos  //  Development.  1998.  V.  125.  №  5.  P.  879–887. DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.5.879
• Hakman I., Hallberg H., Palovaara J. The polar auxin transport inhibitor NPA impairs embryo morphology and increases the expression of an auxin efflux facilitator protein PIN during Picea abies somatic embryo development // Tree Physiol. 2009. V. 29. № 4. 483–496. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpn048
• Hand M.L., de Vries S., Koltunow A.M.G. Melanie L. Hand , Sacco de Vries , Koltunow A.M.G. A Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Asexual Embryogenesis // In Vitro
• Embryogenesis in Higher Plants / Eds Germanа M.A., Lambardi M. Springer, Humana Press, 2016. P. 3–23. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_1
• Harnvanichvech Y., Gorelova V., Sprakel J., Weijers D. The Arabidopsis embryo as a quantifiable model for studying pattern formation // Quant plant Biol. 2021. V. 2: e3. DOI: 10.1017/qpb.2021.3
• Hause B., Hause G., Pechan P., van Lammeren A.A.M. Cytoskeletal changes and induction of embryogenesis in microspore and pollen cultures of Brassica napus L. // Cell. Biol. Int. 1993. V. 17. № 2. P. 153–168. DOI: 10.1006/cbir.1993.1052
• Hause B., van Veenendaal W.L.H., Hause G., van Lammeren A.A.M. Expression of polarity during early development of microspore-derived and zygotic embryos of Brassica napus L. cv. Topas. // Bot. Acta. 1994. V. 107. № 6. P. 407–415. DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1994.tb00815.x
• Horstman A., Bemer M., Boutilier K. A transcriptional view on somatic embryogenesis // Regeneration. 2017. V. 4, № 41. P. 201–216. DOI: 10.1002/reg2.91
• Hudson A. Development of symmetry in plants // Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000. V. 51. P. 349–370. DOI: 1040-2519/00/0601-0349$14.00
• Indrianto A., Barinova I., Touraev A., Heberle-Bors E. Tracking individual wheat microspores in vitro: identification of embryogenic microspores and body axis formation in the embryo // Planta. 2001. V. 212. № 2. P. 163–174. DOI: 10.1007/s004250000375
• Ilic-Grubor K., Attree S.M., Fowke L.C. Comparative morphological study of zygotic and microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus L. as revealed by scanning electron microscopy // Ann. Bot. 1998. V. 82. № 2. P. 157–165. DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0661
• In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants / Eds Germanа M.A., Lambardi M. Springer, Humana Press, 2016. 558 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6
• Joshi R., Kumar P. Regulation of somatic embryogenesis in crops: a review // Agri. Reviews. 2013. V. 34, № 1. P. 1–20.
• Jürgens G. Axis formation in plant embryogenesis : cues and clues // Cell. 1995. V. 81. № 4. P. 467–470.
• Kaplan D.R., Cooke T.J. Fundamental concepts in the embryogenesis of dicotyledons: a morphological interpretation of embryo mutants // Plant Cell. 1997. V. 9. № 11. 1903–1919. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.9.11.1903
• Khanday I., Sundaresan V. Plant zygote development: recent insights and applications to clonal  seeds  //  Curr.  Opin.  Plant  Biol.  2021.  V.  59:  101993. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.101993
• Li D.X., Chen S.J. Tian H.Q. Advances in the study of zygote activation in higher plants
• // Zygote. 2021. V. 29. № 1. P.12-19. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.5.6.621
• Maraschin S.F., Vennik M., Lamers G.E.M., Spaink H.P., Wang M. Time-lapse tracking of barley androgenesis reveals position determined cell death within pro-embryos // Planta. 2005. V. 220. № 4. P. 531–540. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-004-1371-x
• Liu C.-M., Xu Z.-H., Chua N.-H. Auxin polar transport is essential for the establishment of bilateral symmetry during early plant embryogenesis // Plant Cell. 1993. V. 5. № 6. 621–630. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.5.6.621
• Massonneau A., Coronado M.-J., Audran A., Bagniewska A., Mol R., Testillano P.S., Goralski G., Dumas C., Risueno M.-C., Matthys-Rochon E. Multicellular structures developing during maize microspore culture express endosperm and embryospecific genes and show different embryogenic potentialities // Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2005. V. 84. № 7. P. 663–675. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.02.002
• Mathew M.M., Philip V.J. Somatic embryogenesis versus zygotic embryogenesis in Ensete superbum // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2003. V. 72. « 3. P. 267–275. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022311126043
• Mayer K.F., Schoof H., Haecker A., Lenhard M., Jürgens G., Laux T. Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem // Cell. 1998. 95. № 6. P. 805–815. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81703-1
• Méndez-Hernández H.A., Ledezma-Rodríguez M., Avilez-Montalvo R.N., Juárez- Gómez Y.L., Skeete A., Avilez-Montalvo J., De-la-Peña C., Loyola-Vargas V.M. Signaling Overview of Plant Somatic Embryogenesis // Front. Plant Sci. 2019. V. 10: DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00077
• Möller B., Weijers D. Auxin control of embryo patterning // Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009. V. 1. № 3. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001545
• Nomura K., Komamine A. Identifi cation and isolation of single cells that produce somatic embryos at a high frequency in a carrot cell suspension culture // Plant Physiol. 1985. V. 79. № 4. P. 988–991. DOI: 10.1104/pp.79.4.988
• Norstog K. Early development of the barley embryo: fine structure // Amer. J. Bot. 1972. 59. № 2. Р. 123–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2441390
• Obert B., Barnabas B. Colchicine induced embryogenesis in maize // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 2004. V. 77. № 3. P. 283–285. DOI: 10.1023/B:TICU.0000018399.60106.33
• Pasternak T., Prinsen E., Ayaydin F., Miskolczi P., Potters G., van Onckelen H., Dudits D., Feher A. The role of auxin, pH and stress in the activation of embryogenic cell division in leaf protoplast-derived cells of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) // Plant Physiol. 2002. V. 129. № 4. P. 1807–1819. DOI: 10.1104/pp.000810
• Prem D., Solis M.-T., Barany I., Rodriguez-Sanz H., Risueno M.C., Testillano P.S. A new microspore embryogenesis system under low temperature which mimics zygotic embryogenesis initials, expresses auxin and efficiently regenerates doubled-haploid plants in Brassica napus // BMC Plant Biol. 2012. V. 12. № 8. P. 127–144. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-127
• Pulido A., Bakos F., Devic M., Barnabas B., Olmedilla A. HvPG1 and ECA1: two genes activated transcriptionally in the transition of barley microspores from the gametophytic to the embryogenic pathway // Plant Cell Rep. 2009. V. 28. № 4. P. 551–559. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-008-0662-2
• Raghavan V. Double fertilization. Embryo and endosperm development in flowering plants. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006. 237 p.
• Ramalho J.J., Arnold Shivas Jones V., Mutte S., Weijers D. Pole position: How plant cells  polarize  along  the  axes  //  Plant  Cell.  V.  34.  №  1.  P.  174-192. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koab203
• Rubtsova M., Gnad H., Melzer M., Weyen J., Gils M. The auxins centrophenoxine and 2,4-D differ in their effects on non-directly induced chromosome doubling in anther culture of wheat (T. aestivum L.) // Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2013. V. 7. № 3. P. 247–255. DOI: 10.1007/s11816-012-0256-x
• Russell S.D. The egg cell: development and role in fertilization and early embryogenesis // Plant Cell. 1993. V. 5. № 10. Р. 1349–1359.
• Rybczynski J.J., Simonson R.L., Baenziger P.S. Evidence for microspore embryogenesis in wheat anther culture // In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 1991. V. 27. № 4. P. 168–174.  DOI: 10.1007/BF02632212
• Schrick K., Mayer U., Horrichs A., Kuhnt C., Bellini C., Dangl J., Schmidt J., Jürgens G. FACKEL is a sterol C-14 reductase required for organized cell division and expansion in Arabidopsis embryogenesis // Gen. Dev. 2000. V. 14. № 12. P.1471–1484.
• Segui-Simarro J.M., Nuez F. How microspores transform into haploid embryos: changes associated with embryogenesis induction and microspore-derived embryogenesis // Physiol. Plant. 2008. V. 134. № 1. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01113.x
• Schiavone F.M., Cooke T.J. Unusual patterns of somatic embryogenesis in domesticated carrot: developmental effects of exogenous auxins and auxin transport inhibitors // Cell Differ. 1987. V. 21. № 1. P. 53–62. DOI: 10.1016/0045-6039(87)90448-9
• Solis M.-T., Pintos B., Prado M.-J., Bueno M.-A., Raska I., Risueno M.-C., Testillano P.S. Early markers of in vitro microspore reprogramming to embryogenesis in olive (Olea  europaea  L.)  //  Plant.  Sci.  2008.  V.  174.  №  6.  P. 597–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.03.014
• Soriano M., Li H., Boutilier K. Microspore embryogenesis: establishment of embryo identity and pattern in culture // Plant Reprod. 2013. V. 26. № 3. P. 181–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-013-0226-7
• Soriano M., Cistue L., Castillo A. Enhanced induction of microspore embryogenesis after η-butanol treatment in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther culture // Plant Cell Rep. 2008. V. 27. № 5. P. 805–811. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-007-0500-y
• Sheridan W.F., Clark J.K. Mutational analysis of morphogenesis of the maize embryo // Plant J. 1993. V. 3. № 2. P. 347–358. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00186.x
• Schiavone F.M., Cooke T.J. Unusual patterns of somatic embryogenesis in domesticated carrot: developmental effects of exogenous auxins and auxin transport inhibitors // Cell Differ. 1987. V. 21. № 1. P. 53–62. DOI: 10.1016/0045-6039(87)90448-9
• Simmonds D.H., Keller W.A. Significance of preprophase bands of microtubules in the induction of microspore embryogenesis of Brassica napus // Planta. 1999. V. 208. № 3. 383–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050573
• Somatic Embryogenesis: Fundamental Aspects and Applications / Eds Loyola-Vargas V., Synthetic Seeds: Germplasm Regeneration, Preservation and Prospects / Eds Faisal M., Alatar A.A. Springer, Cham, 2019. 482 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24631-0
• Soriano M., Li H., Boutilier K. Microspore embryogenesis: establishment of embryo identity and pattern in culture // Plant Reprod. 2013. V. 26. № 3. P. 181 –196. DOI: 10.1007/s00497-013-0226-7
• Souter M., Lindsey K. Polarity and signalling in plant embryogenesis // J. Exp.Bot. 2000. V. 51. № 347. P. 971–983. DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/51.347.971
• Straatman K.R., Nijsse J., Kieft H., van Aelst A.C., Schel J.H.N. Nuclear pore dynamics during pollen development and androgenesis in Brassica napus // Sex. Plant Reprod. 2000. V. 13. № 1. P. 43–51. DOI: 10.1007/PL00009841
• Sunderland N., Evans L.J. Multicellular pollen formation in cultured barley anthers. II. The A, B and C pathways // J. Exp. Bot. 1980. V. 31. № 2. P. 501–514. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/31.2.501
• Supena E.D.J., Winarto B., Riksen T., Dubas E., van Lammeren A., Offringa R., Boutilier K., Custers J. Regeneration of zygotic-like microspore-derived embryos suggests an important role for the suspensor in early embryo patterning // J. Exp. Bot. 2008. V. 59. № 4. P. 803–814. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm358
• Tang X.C., He Y.Q., Wang Y., Sun M.X. The role of arabinogalactan proteins binding to Yariv reagents in the initiation, cell developmental fate, and maintenance of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. cv. Topas // J. Exp. Bot. 2006. V. 57. № 11. 2639–2650. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl027
• Tang X.C., Liu Y., He Y.Q., Ma L., Sun M.X. Exine dehiscing induces rape microspore polarity, which results in different daughter cell fate and fixes the apical-basal axis of the embryo // J. Exp. Bot. 2013. V. 64. № 1. P. 215–228. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers327
• Tang L.P., Zhang X.S., Su Y.H. Regulation of cell reprogramming by auxin during somatic  embryogenesis  //  aBIOTECH.  2020.  V.  1.  №  3.  P.  185–193. DOI: 10.1007/s42994-020-00029-8
• Telmer C.A., Newcomb W., Simmonds D.H. Cellular changes during heat shock induction and embryo development of cultured microspores of Brassica napus cv. Topas // Protoplasma. 1995. V. 185. № 1–2. P. 106–112. DOI: 10.1007/BF01272758
• Tian H., Sun M.X. Embryoid formation and plantlet regeneration from exine-dehisced microspores in Brassica L. cv. Topas // Acta Agron. Sin. 2003. V. 29. № 1. P. 49–53.
• Toonen M.A.J., Hendriks T., Schmidt E.D.L., Verhoeven H.A., van Kammen A, de Vries S.C. Description of somatic-embryoforming single cells in carrot suspension cultures employing  video  cell  tracking  //  Planta.  1994.  V.  194.  P.  565–572. DOI: 10.1007/BF00714471
• Torres-Ruiz R.A., Jurgens G. Mutations in the FASS gene uncouple pattern formation and morphogenesis in Arabidopsis development // Development. 1994. V. 120. № 10. 2967–2978. DOI: 10.1242/dev.120.10.2967
• Touraev A., Lezin F., Heberle-Bors E., Vicente O. Maintenance of gametophytic development after symmetrical division in tobacco microspore culture // Sex. Plant Reprod. 1995. V. 8. № 2. P. 70–76. DOI: 10.1007/BF00230891
• Ueda M., Zhang Z., Laux T. Transcriptional activation of Arabidopsis axis patterning genes WOX8/9 links zygote polarity to embryo development // Dev Cell. 2011. V. 20. № 2. P. 264–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.009
• Uvakova L., Takac T., Boehm N., Obert B., Samaj J. Proteomic and biochemical analysis of maize anthers after cold pretreatment and induction of androgenesis reveals an important role of anti-oxidative enzymes // J. Proteomics. 2012. V. 75. № 6. 1886–1894. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12267
• Vaddepalli P., de Zeeuw T., Strauss S., Bürstenbinder K., Liao C.-Y., Smith R., Weijers A molecular framework for control of oriented cell division in the Arabidopsis embryo // Cold Spring Harb. Lab. Preprint. DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.09.430440
• Von Arnold S., Sabala I., Bozhkov P., Dyachok J., Filonova L. Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis // Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2002. V.69. № 3. P. 233–249. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015673200621
• Wang K., Chen H., Miao Y., Bayer M. Square one: zygote polarity and early embryogenesis in flowering plants // Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020. V. 53. P. 128–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.10.002
• Wendrich J.R., Weijers D. The Arabidopsis embryo as a miniature morphogenesis model // New Phytologist. 2013. V. 199. № 1. P. 14–25. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12267 West M., Harada J.J. Embryogenesis in higher plants: an overview // Plant Cell. 1993. 5. № 10. P. 1361–1369.
• Winkelmann T. Somatic Versus Zygotic Embryogenesis: Learning from Seeds // In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants / Eds Germanа M.A., Lambardi M. Springer, Humana Press, 2016. P. 24–45. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_2
• Yeung E.C. The canola microspore-derived embryo as a model system to study developmental processes in plants // J. Plant Biol. 2002. V. 45. № 3. P. 119–133. DOI: 10.1007/BF03030304
• Yeung E.C., Meinke D.W. Embryogenesis in angiosperms: development of the suspensor // Plant Cell. 1993. V. 5. № 10. P. 1371–1381. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.5.10.1371
• Yeung E.C., Rahman M.H., Thorpe T.A. Comparative development of zygotic and microspore-derived embryos in Brassica napus L. cv. Topas. I. Histodifferentiation // Intern. J. Plant Sci. 1996. V. 157. № 1. P. 27–39. DOI: 10.1086/297317
• Zaki M.A.M., Dickinson H.G. Modification of cell development in vitro: The effect of colchicine on anther and isolated microspore culture in Brassica napus // Plant Cell, Tiss. Org. Cult. 1995. V. 40. № 3. P. 255–270. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048132
• Zamani I., Kovacs G., Gouli-Vavdinoudi E., Roupakias D. G., Barnabas B. Regeneration of fertile doubled haploid plants from colchicine-supplemented media in wheat anther culture // Plant Breed. 2000. V. 119. № 6. P. 461–465. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439- 0523.2000.00538.x
• Zhang Z., Laux T. The asymmetric division of the Arabidopsis zygote: from cell polarity to an embryo axis // Sex. Plant Reprod. 2011. V. 24. № 2. P. 161–169. DOI: 10.1007/s00497-010-0160-x
• Zonia L.E., Tupy J. Lithium treatment of Nicotiana tabacum microspores blocks polar nuclear migration, disrupts the partitioning of membrane-associated Ca2+, and induces symmetrical mitosis // Sex. Plant Reprod. 1995. V. 8. № 3. P. 152–160. DOI: 10.1007/BF00242260